Coverage Report

Created: 2023-09-30 09:22

/Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/coverage/llvm-project/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ConstraintManager.cpp
Line
Count
Source (jump to first uncovered line)
1
//===- ConstraintManager.cpp - Constraints on symbolic values. ------------===//
2
//
3
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
4
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
5
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
6
//
7
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
8
//
9
//  This file defined the interface to manage constraints on symbolic values.
10
//
11
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
12
13
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/ConstraintManager.h"
14
#include "clang/AST/Type.h"
15
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/MemRegion.h"
16
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/ProgramState.h"
17
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/ProgramState_Fwd.h"
18
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/SVals.h"
19
#include "llvm/ADT/ScopeExit.h"
20
21
using namespace clang;
22
using namespace ento;
23
24
16.2k
ConstraintManager::~ConstraintManager() = default;
25
26
static DefinedSVal getLocFromSymbol(const ProgramStateRef &State,
27
0
                                    SymbolRef Sym) {
28
0
  const MemRegion *R =
29
0
      State->getStateManager().getRegionManager().getSymbolicRegion(Sym);
30
0
  return loc::MemRegionVal(R);
31
0
}
32
33
ConditionTruthVal ConstraintManager::checkNull(ProgramStateRef State,
34
0
                                               SymbolRef Sym) {
35
0
  QualType Ty = Sym->getType();
36
0
  DefinedSVal V = Loc::isLocType(Ty) ? getLocFromSymbol(State, Sym)
37
0
                                     : nonloc::SymbolVal(Sym);
38
0
  const ProgramStatePair &P = assumeDual(State, V);
39
0
  if (P.first && !P.second)
40
0
    return ConditionTruthVal(false);
41
0
  if (!P.first && P.second)
42
0
    return ConditionTruthVal(true);
43
0
  return {};
44
0
}
45
46
template <typename AssumeFunction>
47
ConstraintManager::ProgramStatePair
48
ConstraintManager::assumeDualImpl(ProgramStateRef &State,
49
670k
                                  AssumeFunction &Assume) {
50
670k
  if (LLVM_UNLIKELY(State->isPosteriorlyOverconstrained()))
51
258
    return {State, State};
52
53
  // Assume functions might recurse (see `reAssume` or `tryRearrange`). During
54
  // the recursion the State might not change anymore, that means we reached a
55
  // fixpoint.
56
  // We avoid infinite recursion of assume calls by checking already visited
57
  // States on the stack of assume function calls.
58
670k
  const ProgramState *RawSt = State.get();
59
670k
  if (LLVM_UNLIKELY(AssumeStack.contains(RawSt)))
60
0
    return {State, State};
61
670k
  AssumeStack.push(RawSt);
62
670k
  auto AssumeStackBuilder =
63
670k
      llvm::make_scope_exit([this]() { AssumeStack.pop(); });
ConstraintManager.cpp:std::__1::pair<llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const> > clang::ento::ConstraintManager::assumeDualImpl<clang::ento::ConstraintManager::assumeDual(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::DefinedSVal)::$_0>(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>&, clang::ento::ConstraintManager::assumeDual(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::DefinedSVal)::$_0&)::'lambda'()::operator()() const
Line
Count
Source
63
661k
      llvm::make_scope_exit([this]() { AssumeStack.pop(); });
ConstraintManager.cpp:std::__1::pair<llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const> > clang::ento::ConstraintManager::assumeDualImpl<clang::ento::ConstraintManager::assumeInclusiveRangeDual(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::NonLoc, llvm::APSInt const&, llvm::APSInt const&)::$_0>(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>&, clang::ento::ConstraintManager::assumeInclusiveRangeDual(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::NonLoc, llvm::APSInt const&, llvm::APSInt const&)::$_0&)::'lambda'()::operator()() const
Line
Count
Source
63
8.97k
      llvm::make_scope_exit([this]() { AssumeStack.pop(); });
64
65
670k
  ProgramStateRef StTrue = Assume(true);
66
67
670k
  if (!StTrue) {
68
94.2k
    ProgramStateRef StFalse = Assume(false);
69
94.2k
    if (LLVM_UNLIKELY(!StFalse)) { // both infeasible
70
76
      ProgramStateRef StInfeasible = State->cloneAsPosteriorlyOverconstrained();
71
76
      assert(StInfeasible->isPosteriorlyOverconstrained());
72
      // Checkers might rely on the API contract that both returned states
73
      // cannot be null. Thus, we return StInfeasible for both branches because
74
      // it might happen that a Checker uncoditionally uses one of them if the
75
      // other is a nullptr. This may also happen with the non-dual and
76
      // adjacent `assume(true)` and `assume(false)` calls. By implementing
77
      // assume in therms of assumeDual, we can keep our API contract there as
78
      // well.
79
76
      return ProgramStatePair(StInfeasible, StInfeasible);
80
76
    }
81
94.1k
    return ProgramStatePair(nullptr, StFalse);
82
94.2k
  }
83
84
576k
  ProgramStateRef StFalse = Assume(false);
85
576k
  if (!StFalse) {
86
507k
    return ProgramStatePair(StTrue, nullptr);
87
507k
  }
88
89
69.0k
  return ProgramStatePair(StTrue, StFalse);
90
576k
}
ConstraintManager.cpp:std::__1::pair<llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const> > clang::ento::ConstraintManager::assumeDualImpl<clang::ento::ConstraintManager::assumeDual(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::DefinedSVal)::$_0>(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>&, clang::ento::ConstraintManager::assumeDual(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::DefinedSVal)::$_0&)
Line
Count
Source
49
661k
                                  AssumeFunction &Assume) {
50
661k
  if (LLVM_UNLIKELY(State->isPosteriorlyOverconstrained()))
51
130
    return {State, State};
52
53
  // Assume functions might recurse (see `reAssume` or `tryRearrange`). During
54
  // the recursion the State might not change anymore, that means we reached a
55
  // fixpoint.
56
  // We avoid infinite recursion of assume calls by checking already visited
57
  // States on the stack of assume function calls.
58
661k
  const ProgramState *RawSt = State.get();
59
661k
  if (LLVM_UNLIKELY(AssumeStack.contains(RawSt)))
60
0
    return {State, State};
61
661k
  AssumeStack.push(RawSt);
62
661k
  auto AssumeStackBuilder =
63
661k
      llvm::make_scope_exit([this]() { AssumeStack.pop(); });
64
65
661k
  ProgramStateRef StTrue = Assume(true);
66
67
661k
  if (!StTrue) {
68
92.7k
    ProgramStateRef StFalse = Assume(false);
69
92.7k
    if (LLVM_UNLIKELY(!StFalse)) { // both infeasible
70
74
      ProgramStateRef StInfeasible = State->cloneAsPosteriorlyOverconstrained();
71
74
      assert(StInfeasible->isPosteriorlyOverconstrained());
72
      // Checkers might rely on the API contract that both returned states
73
      // cannot be null. Thus, we return StInfeasible for both branches because
74
      // it might happen that a Checker uncoditionally uses one of them if the
75
      // other is a nullptr. This may also happen with the non-dual and
76
      // adjacent `assume(true)` and `assume(false)` calls. By implementing
77
      // assume in therms of assumeDual, we can keep our API contract there as
78
      // well.
79
74
      return ProgramStatePair(StInfeasible, StInfeasible);
80
74
    }
81
92.6k
    return ProgramStatePair(nullptr, StFalse);
82
92.7k
  }
83
84
568k
  ProgramStateRef StFalse = Assume(false);
85
568k
  if (!StFalse) {
86
502k
    return ProgramStatePair(StTrue, nullptr);
87
502k
  }
88
89
66.5k
  return ProgramStatePair(StTrue, StFalse);
90
568k
}
ConstraintManager.cpp:std::__1::pair<llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const> > clang::ento::ConstraintManager::assumeDualImpl<clang::ento::ConstraintManager::assumeInclusiveRangeDual(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::NonLoc, llvm::APSInt const&, llvm::APSInt const&)::$_0>(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>&, clang::ento::ConstraintManager::assumeInclusiveRangeDual(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::NonLoc, llvm::APSInt const&, llvm::APSInt const&)::$_0&)
Line
Count
Source
49
9.10k
                                  AssumeFunction &Assume) {
50
9.10k
  if (LLVM_UNLIKELY(State->isPosteriorlyOverconstrained()))
51
128
    return {State, State};
52
53
  // Assume functions might recurse (see `reAssume` or `tryRearrange`). During
54
  // the recursion the State might not change anymore, that means we reached a
55
  // fixpoint.
56
  // We avoid infinite recursion of assume calls by checking already visited
57
  // States on the stack of assume function calls.
58
8.97k
  const ProgramState *RawSt = State.get();
59
8.97k
  if (LLVM_UNLIKELY(AssumeStack.contains(RawSt)))
60
0
    return {State, State};
61
8.97k
  AssumeStack.push(RawSt);
62
8.97k
  auto AssumeStackBuilder =
63
8.97k
      llvm::make_scope_exit([this]() { AssumeStack.pop(); });
64
65
8.97k
  ProgramStateRef StTrue = Assume(true);
66
67
8.97k
  if (!StTrue) {
68
1.46k
    ProgramStateRef StFalse = Assume(false);
69
1.46k
    if (LLVM_UNLIKELY(!StFalse)) { // both infeasible
70
2
      ProgramStateRef StInfeasible = State->cloneAsPosteriorlyOverconstrained();
71
2
      assert(StInfeasible->isPosteriorlyOverconstrained());
72
      // Checkers might rely on the API contract that both returned states
73
      // cannot be null. Thus, we return StInfeasible for both branches because
74
      // it might happen that a Checker uncoditionally uses one of them if the
75
      // other is a nullptr. This may also happen with the non-dual and
76
      // adjacent `assume(true)` and `assume(false)` calls. By implementing
77
      // assume in therms of assumeDual, we can keep our API contract there as
78
      // well.
79
2
      return ProgramStatePair(StInfeasible, StInfeasible);
80
2
    }
81
1.46k
    return ProgramStatePair(nullptr, StFalse);
82
1.46k
  }
83
84
7.50k
  ProgramStateRef StFalse = Assume(false);
85
7.50k
  if (!StFalse) {
86
5.04k
    return ProgramStatePair(StTrue, nullptr);
87
5.04k
  }
88
89
2.46k
  return ProgramStatePair(StTrue, StFalse);
90
7.50k
}
91
92
ConstraintManager::ProgramStatePair
93
661k
ConstraintManager::assumeDual(ProgramStateRef State, DefinedSVal Cond) {
94
1.32M
  auto AssumeFun = [&, Cond](bool Assumption) {
95
1.32M
    return assumeInternal(State, Cond, Assumption);
96
1.32M
  };
97
661k
  return assumeDualImpl(State, AssumeFun);
98
661k
}
99
100
ConstraintManager::ProgramStatePair
101
ConstraintManager::assumeInclusiveRangeDual(ProgramStateRef State, NonLoc Value,
102
                                            const llvm::APSInt &From,
103
9.10k
                                            const llvm::APSInt &To) {
104
17.9k
  auto AssumeFun = [&](bool Assumption) {
105
17.9k
    return assumeInclusiveRangeInternal(State, Value, From, To, Assumption);
106
17.9k
  };
107
9.10k
  return assumeDualImpl(State, AssumeFun);
108
9.10k
}
109
110
ProgramStateRef ConstraintManager::assume(ProgramStateRef State,
111
32.0k
                                          DefinedSVal Cond, bool Assumption) {
112
32.0k
  ConstraintManager::ProgramStatePair R = assumeDual(State, Cond);
113
32.0k
  return Assumption ? 
R.first18.0k
:
R.second13.9k
;
114
32.0k
}
115
116
ProgramStateRef
117
ConstraintManager::assumeInclusiveRange(ProgramStateRef State, NonLoc Value,
118
                                        const llvm::APSInt &From,
119
8.07k
                                        const llvm::APSInt &To, bool InBound) {
120
8.07k
  ConstraintManager::ProgramStatePair R =
121
8.07k
      assumeInclusiveRangeDual(State, Value, From, To);
122
8.07k
  return InBound ? 
R.first4.77k
:
R.second3.29k
;
123
8.07k
}